Comparison · Prop firms

FTMO vs FundedNext: which prop firm is better?

As of October 29, 2026, FTMO leads FundedNext by 3.6 points in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #1 internationally against #3. The gap comes mainly from the Trading conditions and Trader reviews pillars.

2027 edition · updated October 29, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · Ranking methodology

The criteria, side by side

CriterionFTMOFundedNext
Score out of 10077.674.0
International rank#1#3
$100,000 account$601$550
Trust · 30 %3.86/53.83/5
1. Regulator warnings5/55/5
2. Registered company and age5/5n/a
3. Identity and contact5/55/5
4. Regulated execution partner2/52/5
5. Honest marketing1/51/5
6. Secure website5/55/5
7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)4/55/5
Payouts · 25 %3.00/53.00/5
8. Public payout proof1/53/5
9. Published processing time4/55/5
10. Payout frequency and first payout3/51/5
11. Withdrawal terms and methods2/51/5
12. Payout history and incidents5/55/5
Trader reviews · 20 %5.00/54.67/5
13. Trader rating (Trustpilot and Google)5/54/5
14. Number of reviews5/55/5
15. Suspicious review warning5/55/5
16. 12-month trendn/an/a
Trading conditions · 15 %3.83/53.33/5
17. Rule clarity3/52/5
18. Cost of a $100,000 account3/53/5
19. Profit target relative to maximum loss4/54/5
20. Drawdown type5/55/5
21. Rules restricting how you trade4/55/5
22. What the trader keeps: split and fees4/51/5
Visibility · 10 %4.00/53.67/5
23. Track record5/55/5
24. Websites linking to it3/52/5
25. Press mentions, Wikipedia page––
26. Audience4/54/5

In green, the better of the two. “n/a”: not applicable. “Not verified”: data not found in public sources, counts as 1. The evidence and source for each score are on each firm's page. Prices change often: these are as of the reading date.

FTMO: full reviewFundedNext: full reviewCompare two prop firms