Comparison
Tradoshi vs TraderSync
TraderSync is one of the oldest trading journals on the market, more than ten years old, and it is a serious opponent: on several lines of this comparison it does better than us, including on its partner program. Sourced on the same day from its two public pages, with nothing rounded in our favour.
Sourced on 2 August 2026
The comparison at a glance
Thirteen lines to decide fast. Everything is detailed below, with sources.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29.95/mo | $19.99/mo · −33% |
| Mid plan price | $49.95/mo | $29.99/mo · −40% |
| Top plan price | $79.95/mo | $49.99/mo · −37% |
| Accounts on the entry plan | 5 | 3 |
| Free trial | 7 days | 7 days |
| AI assistant on the entry plan | 5 messages per day | 600 credits per month |
| Partner commission | 30% recurring, $200 threshold | 15 to 25% for life, €500 threshold |
| Market replay | Down to 250 ms, Level II | Trade Review on the real chart |
| Mobile app | Yes | iOS and Android, being published |
| Brokers announced | 700+ | 2,000+, list and PDF published |
| Pre-trade psychology | Absent from their grid | Voice check-in + emotion detection |
| Discipline score | Absent from their grid | From the entry plan |
| Mentoring | Absent from their grid | Free mentor account |
| Track record | More than ten years | We are starting out |
1. The customer offer, plan by plan
Both publishers' three plans, with what each one actually unlocks. Prices are the ones shown on both pricing pages on the day of the survey.
TraderSync
Billed in dollars$29.95/mo
or $269.52/year ($22.46/mo)- 5 accounts
- Unlimited trade imports
- Cypher: 5 messages per day
- 3 strategies, 1 trade plan
- Market replay at 1-minute precision
- No Cypher Coach
$49.95/mo
or $449.52/year ($37.46/mo)- Unlimited accounts
- Cypher: 15 messages per day
- Cypher Coach included
- 1-second replay
- Unlimited strategies and plans
$79.95/mo
or $719.52/year ($59.96/mo)- Cypher: 60 messages per day
- 250 ms replay
- Level II and time and sales
- All assets, options included
Tradoshi
Billed in dollars$19.99/mo
or $199/year ($16.58/mo)- 3 connected broker accounts
- 600 AI credits per month
- Oshi AI coach on your data
- Discipline score and written check-in
- 500+ reports and Oshi Score
- No trade limit
$29.99/mo
or $299/year ($24.92/mo)- 50 accounts, multi prop firm, challenge tracking
- 1,500 AI credits
- Voice check-in and emotion detection
- Prescriptive AI daily reco
- Mentor invited for free
$49.99/mo
or $499/year ($41.58/mo)- Unlimited accounts
- 3,000 AI credits
- Live session: in-session guardrails
- Trade Review on the real chart
- Priority support
Every price on this page is in dollars, on both sides, and no exchange rate is applied. Their annual discount is 25%, ours charges ten months out of twelve.
Two gaps, and the first is obvious: TraderSync costs 33 to 40% more than us at every tier, $29.95 against $19.99 at entry, $49.95 against $29.99 in the middle, $79.95 against $49.99 at the top. The second gap is subtler and weighs as much: the unit the AI is metered in. They count in messages per day, five on the entry plan. An assistant you can ask five questions a day is not an assistant, it is a quota. We count in credits per month, 600 from the entry plan, which leaves room for one heavy day of analysis then three quiet ones.
2. The partner offer, in months of revenue
This is the section where TraderSync does better than us, and there is no angle around it. Their affiliate page states: “The commission is 30% of the subscription price on all subsequent subscriptions”, with their own example, a $50 per month subscriber earns the partner $15 per month. No maximum duration is published.
Our schedule pays 15% from the first customer, 20% from fifteen active subscribers and 25% from fifty-one, for life on every payment collected. That beats the category leader, which caps at six or twelve months. It does not beat TraderSync.
Comparing two percentages means nothing while the durations differ. The honest unit is months of the referred customer's revenue: it neutralises both the product price and the commission duration. Read it as: for a customer who stays N months, the partner has earned the equivalent of X months of that customer's revenue.
| Program | Stays 6 months | Stays 12 months | Stays 24 months | Stays 36 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TraderSync, 30% recurring | 1.80 | 3.60 | 7.20 | 10.80 |
| Tradoshi 15% (from the 1st customer) | 0.90 | 1.80 | 3.60 | 5.40 |
| Tradoshi 20% (15 customers and up) | 1.20 | 2.40 | 4.80 | 7.20 |
| Tradoshi 25% (51 customers and up) | 1.50 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 |
The table reads by itself: at every horizon and every tier, TraderSync pays more. And since their subscriptions cost more, the gap is even wider in money than in months of revenue. If your only criterion is what a referral earns you, the honest answer is that you should recommend TraderSync.
Other terms recorded on their side: monthly PayPal payouts, real-time dashboard, application required. On our side, the commission lands on every payment collected, with a 30-day holding period.
3. Mentoring, and who pays for whom
Mentoring appears nowhere on TraderSync's grid: no dedicated row, no student invitation, no shared space. Their product is built for a solo trader facing their statistics, and their public comparison almost claims it, describing the tool as an individual analysis desk.
At Tradoshi, the mentor account is free. The student is the subscriber, from the Pro plan up, and invites their mentor, who pays nothing to follow their trades and progress.
For a trader working alone this line is worth nothing. For a school it is worth everything: following thirty students costs nothing extra, where elsewhere it would take one subscription per supervisor. It is the only place where we regain ground on partnerships, having lost it on commissions.
How mentoring works at Tradoshi · The offer for educators and schools
4. The full comparison, feature by feature
Every line comes from both public pricing pages, read on the same day. Nothing is pulled from a help centre on one side and a grid on the other: on unequal evidence, a comparison stops being honest. “Absent from the grid” means exactly that, not “does not exist”.
Accounts, data and coverage
Both sync the broker and impose no trade limit. The gap is on entry-plan accounts, where they are more generous, and on announced coverage, where we are.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts: entry / mid / top | 5 / unlimited / unlimited | 3 / 50 / unlimited |
| Trade limit | None | None |
| Brokers announced | 700+ | 2,000+ |
| Public list to back it up | Not published | 2,024 names + PDF, dated survey |
| Fees and commissions applied | Yes, automatic | Yes, supplied by the broker |
| Multi-currency | Yes | Yes |
Artificial intelligence, and how it is metered
Both sell an AI assistant. The unit changes everything: theirs is a number of messages per day, ours is a volume of credits per month.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Conversational assistant | Cypher: 5 / 15 / 60 messages per day | Oshi Coach: 600 / 1,500 / 3,000 credits per month |
| Proactive AI coach | Cypher Coach, from the mid plan | Prescriptive daily reco, from Pro |
| Automated backtesting | Yes, stocks, forex, crypto | No, manual backtesting |
Replay and execution analysis
Their turf, by a long way. This is where they have ten years of lead and real technical depth.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Replay precision | 1 min / 1 s / 250 ms | Trade Review on the real chart |
| Level II and time and sales | Yes, on the top plan | No |
| Exit analysis | Exit efficiency and optimal exit point | MFE / MAE and R-multiple |
Psychology, discipline and risk
The mirror of the previous block: this is our turf, and none of it appears on their pricing grid.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Written emotional check-in | Absent from their grid | From the entry plan |
| Voice check-in and emotion detection | Absent from their grid | From Pro |
| Discipline score | Absent from their grid | From the entry plan |
| In-session guardrails | Absent from their grid | Live session (Premium) |
| Risk computed per account | Risk exposure report | Yes, per account, plus prop firm rules |
Access, mobile and community
Two identical seven-day trials, and a mobile app they have and we do not yet.
| What is compared | TraderSync | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | 7 days | 7 days |
| Mobile app | Yes | iOS and Android, being published |
| Mentoring | Absent from their grid | Free mentor account |
| Languages | English | French and English |
| Track record | More than ten years | We are starting out |
Look up your broker in our list · See all three plans in detail · Watch the video demo
5. What we concede to TraderSync
A comparison won on every single line is not a comparison, it is an advert. Here are the points where TraderSync is ahead, with nothing taken off.
The verdict
TraderSync is the closest comparison in this series, and the only one where we lose an entire section. Three questions settle it. Do you work on second-level execution? Then their 250 ms replay with Level II has no equivalent, and the rest is secondary. Are you a creator or an educator? Their commission is better, but our mentor account is free, which changes a school's economics rather than an affiliate's. Is your problem measurement or discipline? If it is measuring, they have done it well for ten years. If it is sticking to your rules, nothing there takes care of it.
Frequently asked questions
Which one is cheaper?
Tradoshi, and at every tier, not just at entry. Their entry plan is $29.95 where ours is $19.99, 33 percent less. Their mid plan is $49.95 where ours is $29.99, 40 percent less. Their top plan is $79.95 where ours is $49.99, 37 percent less. In exchange, their top plan unlocks the 250 millisecond replay with Level II, which we do not have.
Which affiliate program pays better?
Theirs. TraderSync pays 30 percent on all subsequent subscriptions, with no published maximum duration, and a $200 payout threshold. Tradoshi pays 15 percent from the first customer, 20 at fifteen customers and 25 at fifty-one, with a €500 threshold. At every horizon a partner earns more with them.
What does Tradoshi do that TraderSync does not?
Three things absent from their pricing grid as of 2 August 2026: the emotional check-in, written then voice with emotion detection, the discipline score, and in-session guardrails. Plus the free mentor account, which lets an educator follow their students without subscribing.
How is the AI limited on each side?
TraderSync counts in messages per day, five on the entry plan, fifteen in the middle, sixty at the top. Tradoshi counts in credits per month, 600 at entry, then 1,500 and 3,000. The practical difference is that a monthly quota allows one heavy day of analysis, a daily quota does not.
What does TraderSync do better than Tradoshi?
Five things. A more rewarding affiliate program. Market replay down to 250 milliseconds with Level II. Five accounts on the entry plan against three. A mobile app already published. And more than ten years of existence.
Compare with another trading journal
Try it, and compare on your own trades
Connect your broker, let your journal fill itself, and judge on your own numbers rather than on a table.
Start for free 7-day trial · then from $19.99/month · cancel in one clickMethod and sources. Every figure attributed to TraderSync was read on 2 August 2026 on its own public pages, in the served HTML, and not taken from a third-party comparison: tradersync.com/pricing · tradersync.com/affiliate-program. The “absent from the grid” statements were obtained by counting term occurrences in the served page, not by eye. The months-of-revenue values are computed from the published schedules on both sides, month by month, not typed by hand. A publisher's pricing changes without notice, and this one raised all three of its plans overnight on 16 July 2026: when in doubt, the publisher's own page prevails over this one. If you spot a mistake, write to us and it will be corrected with the date. Report an error to us.