Comparison
Tradoshi vs TradingView
Let us say it before anything else: TradingView is not a trading journal, and Tradoshi is not a charting platform. The word “journal” does not appear once on their pricing page, verified by counting on 2 August 2026. This page exists because the question comes up constantly, and the honest answer is that most serious traders use both.
Sourced on 2 August 2026
The comparison at a glance
Thirteen lines to decide fast. Everything is detailed below, with sources.
| What is compared | TradingView | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Charting platform | Trading journal |
| The word “journal” on their pricing page | Zero occurrences | It is the product |
| Automatic broker sync | No, for journaling | Yes, 2,000+ brokers |
| Charts and indicators | The market reference | Trade review chart |
| Bar replay | Yes | Trade Review on the real chart |
| Strategy testing | Yes, in Pine Script | Manual backtesting |
| Trader performance statistics | Absent from their grid | 500+ reports, Oshi Score |
| Emotional check-in | Absent from their grid | Written then voice |
| Mentoring | Absent from their grid | Free mentor account |
| Free plan | Yes | No, 7-day trial |
| Paid entry price | $14.95/mo | $19.99/mo |
1. The customer offer, plan by plan
Both publishers' three plans, with what each one actually unlocks. Prices are the ones shown on both pricing pages on the day of the survey.
TradingView
Billed in dollars$0
free, with ads- Basic charts and indicators
- One price alert
$14.95/mo
read from their structured data- More indicators and alerts
- No ads
$34.95/mo
read from their structured data- More indicators again
- More charts per layout
$69.95/mo
Ultimate at $119.95/mo- Second-level data
- Top level of indicators and alerts
Tradoshi
Billed in dollars$19.99/mo
or $199/year ($16.58/mo)- No trade limit
- 3 connected broker accounts
- 600 AI credits per month
- Oshi AI coach on your data
- Discipline score and written check-in
- 500+ reports and Oshi Score
$29.99/mo
or $299/year ($24.92/mo)- 50 accounts, multi prop firm, challenge tracking
- 1,500 AI credits
- Voice check-in and emotion detection
- Prescriptive AI daily reco
- Backtesting (10 strategies)
- Mentor invited for free
$49.99/mo
or $499/year ($41.58/mo)- Unlimited accounts
- 3,000 AI credits
- Live session: in-session guardrails
- Trade Review on the real chart
- Unlimited backtesting
- Priority support
Every price on this page is in dollars, on both sides, and no exchange rate is applied. TradingView prices were read from the structured data of their pricing page on 2 August 2026; they vary by billing period and region, so their page prevails over this one.
Comparing prices makes little sense here, since the two products do different jobs. What matters: TradingView does not keep your trade history, does not compute your profit factor, does not know what state you were in, and does not claim to. And we will never replace its charts.
2. The partner offer, in months of revenue
TradingView has an affiliate program, but it covers a product that is not a trading journal: recommending one does not rule out the other, and a creator can earn both commissions.
Our schedule is public and pays from the first customer: 15% for life, 20% at fifteen active subscribers, 25% at fifty-one, on every payment collected.
Comparing two percentages means nothing while the durations differ. The honest unit is months of the referred customer's revenue: it neutralises both the product price and the commission duration. Read it as: for a customer who stays N months, the partner has earned the equivalent of X months of that customer's revenue.
| Program | Stays 6 months | Stays 12 months | Stays 24 months | Stays 36 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradoshi 15% (from the 1st customer) | 0.90 | 1.80 | 3.60 | 5.40 |
| Tradoshi 20% (15 customers and up) | 1.20 | 2.40 | 4.80 | 7.20 |
| Tradoshi 25% (51 customers and up) | 1.50 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 |
The table only holds our rows: the two programs cover products that are not comparable, and putting them side by side would teach nothing.
On our side, the commission lands on every payment collected, with a 30-day holding period and a €500 payout threshold.
3. Mentoring, and who pays for whom
Mentoring appears nowhere on TradingView's grid: no dedicated row, no student invitation, no shared space. The product is built for a solo trader facing their statistics.
At Tradoshi, the mentor account is free. The student is the subscriber, from the Pro plan up, and invites their mentor, who pays nothing to follow their trades and progress.
For a trader working alone this line is worth nothing, and that should be said. For a school or an educator it decides everything: following thirty students costs nothing extra, where elsewhere it would take one subscription per supervisor.
How mentoring works at Tradoshi · The offer for educators and schools
4. The full comparison, feature by feature
Every line comes from both public pricing pages, read on the same day. Nothing is pulled from a help centre on one side and a grid on the other: on unequal evidence, a comparison stops being honest. “Absent from the grid” means exactly that, not “does not exist”.
Before the trade
Their turf, and there is no debate: nobody replaces TradingView on chart analysis.
| What is compared | TradingView | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Charts and indicators | The world reference | Review chart, not analysis |
| Price alerts | Yes | No |
| Bar replay for practice | Yes | Manual backtesting |
| Coded strategy testing | Yes, Pine Script | No |
| Pre-session emotional check-in | Absent from their grid | Written then voice |
After the trade
Our turf. This is where TradingView stops, and they do not claim otherwise.
| What is compared | TradingView | Tradoshi |
|---|---|---|
| Synced trade history | No | Yes, 2,000+ brokers |
| Performance statistics | Absent from their grid | 500+ reports |
| Risk computed per account | No | Yes, plus prop firm rules |
| Discipline score | Absent from their grid | From the entry plan |
| Mentor account | Absent from their grid | Free |
Look up your broker in our list · See all three plans in detail · Watch the video demo
5. What we concede to TradingView
A comparison won on every single line is not a comparison, it is an advert. Here are the points where TradingView is ahead, with nothing taken off.
The verdict
There is no winner, and a comparison page naming one would be dishonest. TradingView answers “what is the market doing?” and nobody does it better. Tradoshi answers “what am I doing?”: what are my losing streaks, at what hour do I lose, what state was I in, and do I stick to my rules. Those two questions have nothing to do with each other. The most common setup among traders who improve is simple: TradingView open to analyse, Tradoshi connected to the broker to measure.
Frequently asked questions
Can TradingView be used as a trading journal?
Not in the usual sense. The word “journal” does not appear once on their pricing page, verified by counting on 2 August 2026. You can take notes on a chart, but there is no broker sync, no measured trade history and no trader performance statistics.
Do you have to choose between them?
No, and that is the honest answer. They do different jobs: TradingView analyses the market before entry, Tradoshi measures what you did afterwards. Most serious traders use both.
Which one is cheaper?
TradingView at entry, $14.95 per month against our $19.99, and they have a genuinely usable free plan. But their plans go up to $119.95, and it is not the same product.
Does Tradoshi replace TradingView's charts?
No, and we do not try. Our chart is there to review a past trade on the real candles, not to analyse the market. For analysis, TradingView remains the reference.
What does Tradoshi do that TradingView does not?
Sync your broker and measure your trades, compute your risk per account and your prop firm rules, capture your emotional state before the session, score your discipline, and let a mentor follow you for free.
Compare with another trading journal
Try it, and compare on your own trades
Connect your broker, let your journal fill itself, and judge on your own numbers rather than on a table.
Start for free 7-day trial · then from $19.99/month · cancel in one clickMethod and sources. Every figure attributed to TradingView was read on 2 August 2026 on its own public pages, in the served HTML, and not taken from a third-party comparison: www.tradingview.com/pricing/. The “absent from the grid” statements were obtained by counting term occurrences in the served page, not by eye. The months-of-revenue values are computed from the published schedules on both sides, month by month, not typed by hand. A publisher's pricing changes without notice, and this one raised all three of its plans overnight on 16 July 2026: when in doubt, the publisher's own page prevails over this one. If you spot a mistake, write to us and it will be corrected with the date. Report an error to us.