Tradoshi vs Edgewonk

The comparison at a glance

Thirteen lines to decide fast. Everything is detailed below, with sources.

1. The customer offer, plan by plan

Both publishers' three plans, with what each one actually unlocks. Prices are the ones shown on both pricing pages on the day of the survey.

Every price on this page is in dollars, on both sides, and no exchange rate is applied. Edgewonk lists VAT country by country, from $197.73 in Malta to $250.19 elsewhere: the price actually paid depends on the billing country, and they publish it that way themselves.

Over a year, Edgewonk costs less than us, $169 against $199, and that should be said before anything else. Two trade-offs, published on their own page: no free trial, so you pay for the year before you know, and no monthly payment, so no way to spread it or stop midway.

2. The partner offer, in months of revenue

Edgewonk has an affiliate program, mentioned on its site, but its terms are not published: no rate, no duration, no threshold. And since their product is an annual licence rather than a subscription, recurring commission does not mean the same thing.

Our schedule is public and recurring: 15% for life from the first customer on every payment collected, 20% from fifteen active subscribers, 25% from fifty-one. On a renewing subscription a partner is paid every month; on an annual licence, once a year at best.

Comparing two percentages means nothing while the durations differ. The honest unit is months of the referred customer's revenue: it neutralises both the product price and the commission duration. Read it as: for a customer who stays N months, the partner has earned the equivalent of X months of that customer's revenue.

The table only holds our rows: you do not compute what a competitor does not publish. It reads in months of the referred customer's revenue, the unit that neutralises product price and commission duration.

On our side, the commission lands on every payment collected, with a 30-day holding period and a €500 payout threshold.

3. Mentoring, and who pays for whom

Mentoring appears nowhere on Edgewonk's grid: no dedicated row, no student invitation, no shared space. The product is built for a solo trader facing their statistics.

At Tradoshi, the mentor account is free. The student is the subscriber, from the Pro plan up, and invites their mentor, who pays nothing to follow their trades and progress.

For a trader working alone this line is worth nothing, and that should be said. For a school or an educator it decides everything: following thirty students costs nothing extra, where elsewhere it would take one subscription per supervisor.

How mentoring works at Tradoshi · The offer for educators and schools

4. The full comparison, feature by feature

Every line comes from both public pricing pages, read on the same day. Nothing is pulled from a help centre on one side and a grid on the other: on unequal evidence, a comparison stops being honest. “Absent from the grid” means exactly that, not “does not exist”.

Look up your broker in our list · See all three plans in detail · Watch the video demo

5. What we concede to Edgewonk

A comparison won on every single line is not a comparison, it is an advert. Here are the points where Edgewonk is ahead, with nothing taken off.

The verdict

This is the most honest comparison in the series, because both products aim at the same thing: stopping you repeating the same mistake. Two questions settle it. Are you willing to enter your trades by hand? If yes, Edgewonk costs less per year and has worked on biases for ten years. If no, their file import becomes the chore that makes you abandon the journal, and our automatic sync is the only answer. Do you want a verdict or a guardrail? Edgewonk explains what happened very well. Tradoshi tries to step in before it happens, with a voice check-in before the session and alerts during it.

Frequently asked questions

Compare with another trading journal