Tradoshi vs Tradervue

The comparison at a glance

Thirteen lines to decide fast. Everything is detailed below, with sources.

1. The customer offer, plan by plan

Both publishers' three plans, with what each one actually unlocks. Prices are the ones shown on both pricing pages on the day of the survey.

Every price on this page is in dollars, on both sides, and no exchange rate is applied. Tradervue publishes no annual pricing, checked across their whole page HTML: there is no way to spread the cost.

Two plans, not three, and no annual pricing: at Tradervue you pay every month at full price, with no way to spread it. And commission tracking, which decides whether your P&L is accurate or approximate, is reserved for the $49.95 plan. With us it comes from the broker, on every plan.

2. The partner offer, in months of revenue

Tradervue has an affiliate program, mentioned on its site, but its terms are not published: no rate, no duration, no payout threshold. A creator cannot know what they would earn without writing in and waiting.

Our schedule is public and pays from the first customer: 15% for life on every payment collected, 20% from fifteen active subscribers, 25% from fifty-one.

Comparing two percentages means nothing while the durations differ. The honest unit is months of the referred customer's revenue: it neutralises both the product price and the commission duration. Read it as: for a customer who stays N months, the partner has earned the equivalent of X months of that customer's revenue.

The table only holds our rows, and that is not an oversight: you do not compute what a competitor does not publish. If Tradervue publishes its schedule, this page will be updated with the survey date.

On our side, the commission lands on every payment collected for as long as the customer stays subscribed, with a 30-day holding period and a €500 payout threshold.

3. Mentoring, and who pays for whom

This is the only competitor in this series whose mentoring is better than the market average: unlimited from Silver, at $29.95 per month, with no published student cap. Where others reserve student invitations for a $59 plan, Tradervue opens it on the first paid tier.

At Tradoshi the billing runs the other way: the mentor account is free, the student is the subscriber from Pro up. The mentor pays nothing, ever, whatever the number of students.

The difference is subtle and deserves honesty. There, the mentor subscribes at $29.95 per month and follows as many students as they like, which is $359 a year. Here they pay nothing, but each student must be on Pro. For a school whose students already pay, we are free; for a lone mentor whose students do not pay, Tradervue is simpler.

How mentoring works at Tradoshi · The offer for educators and schools

4. The full comparison, feature by feature

Every line comes from both public pricing pages, read on the same day. Nothing is pulled from a help centre on one side and a grid on the other: on unequal evidence, a comparison stops being honest. “Absent from the grid” means exactly that, not “does not exist”.

Look up your broker in our list · See all three plans in detail · Watch the video demo

5. What we concede to Tradervue

A comparison won on every single line is not a comparison, it is an advert. Here are the points where Tradervue is ahead, with nothing taken off.

The verdict

Tradervue and Tradoshi answer different questions. Theirs: what do my trades say about my execution? They have answered it for more than ten years, with a depth nobody matches, liquidity reports first among them. Ours: what stops me sticking to my rules? That is a discipline and emotion question, and nothing on their grid addresses it. If you supervise students who are not subscribers, their unlimited mentoring at $29.95 is simpler. If your students already pay, our free mentor account costs you nothing.

Frequently asked questions

Compare with another trading journal