Comparison · Prop firms

Blue Guardian vs Funding Pips: which prop firm is better?

As of October 30, 2026, Blue Guardian leads Funding Pips by 3.9 points in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #56 internationally against #107. The gap comes mainly from the Payouts and Trust pillars. Funding Pips does better on Trader reviews and Visibility.

2027 edition · updated October 30, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · International ranking · Ranking methodology · Prop firm directory

The criteria, side by side

CriterionBlue GuardianFunding Pips
Score out of 10071.467.5
International rank#56#107
$100,000 account$623$652
Trust · 30 %3.66/52.95/5
1. Regulator warningsscale5/55/5
2. Registered company and agescale–1/5
3. Identity and contactscale5/51/5
4. Regulated execution partnerscale2/52/5
5. Honest marketingscale1/52/5
6. Secure websitescale5/55/5
7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)scale2/53/5
Payouts · 25 %4.29/52.88/5
8. Public payout proofscale3/51/5
9. Published processing timescale5/54/5
10. Payout frequency and first payoutscale5/51/5
11. Withdrawal terms and methodsscale2/52/5
12. Payout history and incidentsscale4/55/5
Trader reviews · 20 %2.67/54.67/5
13. Trader rating (Trustpilot and Google)scale1/54/5
14. Number of reviewsscale4/55/5
15. Suspicious review warningscale3/55/5
16. 12-month trendscalen/an/a
Trading conditions · 15 %3.66/53.29/5
17. Rule clarityscale4/54/5
18. Cost of a $100,000 accountscale3/51/5
19. Profit target relative to maximum lossscale5/54/5
20. Drawdown typescale2/55/5
21. Rules restricting how you tradescale3/53/5
22. What the trader keeps: split and feesscale3/51/5
Visibility · 10 %3.18/53.43/5
23. Track recordscale5/54/5
24. Websites linking to itscale2/52/5
25. Press mentions, Wikipedia pagescale1/52/5
26. Audiencescale2/5–

In green, the better of the two. “n/a”: not applicable. “Not verified”: data not found in public sources, counts as 1. The evidence and source for each score are on each firm's page. Prices change often: these are as of the reading date.

Blue Guardian: full reviewFunding Pips: full reviewCompare two prop firms

Frequently asked questions

Is Blue Guardian or Funding Pips better?

As of October 30, 2026, Blue Guardian leads Funding Pips by 3.9 points in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #56 internationally against #107. The gap comes mainly from the Payouts and Trust pillars. Funding Pips does better on Trader reviews and Visibility.

How much does a $100,000 account cost at Blue Guardian and Funding Pips?

At list price, activation fees included: Blue Guardian (instant funding): $623; Funding Pips (2 steps): $652. These are not the same account types: the two prices do not compare directly, and each is rated against accounts of its own type. Prices change often: check them on each firm's website before buying.

What is the maximum loss at Blue Guardian and Funding Pips?

On the programme read: Blue Guardian: 6% in total, 3% a day, trailing drawdown; Funding Pips: 10% in total, 5% a day, static drawdown. These rules vary with the programme chosen.

Which is more trustworthy, Blue Guardian or Funding Pips?

Trust score out of 100: Blue Guardian 73.2, Funding Pips 59.0. It covers regulator warnings, the company register, the identity shown, the execution partner, marketing and website security. Neither appears on the warning lists consulted. This score describes what is published at that date; it does not guarantee future payouts.

Which platforms do Blue Guardian and Funding Pips offer?

According to their public pages, Blue Guardian offers MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker, TradingView, Tradovate and Volumetrica (DeepCharts), and Funding Pips MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Match-Trader. In common: MetaTrader 5 and Match-Trader.