For Traders vs BluSky: which prop firm is better?
As of November 14, 2026, For Traders leads BluSky by 0.9 point in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #24 internationally against #30. The gap comes mainly from the Visibility and Trust pillars. BluSky does better on Payouts and Trader reviews.
2027 edition · updated November 14, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · International ranking · Ranking methodology · Prop firm directory
The criteria, side by side
| Criterion | For Traders | BluSky |
|---|---|---|
| Score out of 100 | 76.2 | 75.3 |
| International rank | #24 | #30 |
| $100,000 account | $469 | $316 |
| Trust · 30 % | 3.86/5 | 3.29/5 |
| 1. Regulator warningsscale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 2. Registered company and agescale | n/a | n/a |
| 3. Identity and contactscale | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| 4. Regulated execution partnerscale | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| 5. Honest marketingscale | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| 6. Secure websitescale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)scale | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| Payouts · 25 % | 4.06/5 | 4.76/5 |
| 8. Public payout proofscale | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| 9. Published processing timescale | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| 10. Payout frequency and first payoutscale | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| 11. Withdrawal terms and methodsscale | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| 12. Payout history and incidentsscale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Trader reviews · 20 % | 3.33/5 | 4.00/5 |
| 13. Trader rating (Google and other review platforms)scale | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| 14. Number of reviewsscale | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| 15. Suspicious review warningscale | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| 16. 12-month trendscale | n/a | n/a |
| Trading conditions · 15 % | 3.86/5 | 3.29/5 |
| 17. Rule clarityscale | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| 18. Cost of a $100,000 accountscale | 5/5 | 2/5 |
| 19. Profit target relative to maximum lossscale | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| 20. Drawdown typescale | 1/5 | 3/5 |
| 21. Rules restricting how you tradescale | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| 22. What the trader keeps: split and feesscale | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Visibility · 10 % | 3.91/5 | 2.93/5 |
| 23. Track recordscale | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| 24. Websites linking to itscale | 2/5 | 1/5 |
| 25. Press mentions, Wikipedia pagescale | – | – |
| 26. Audiencescale | 2/5 | 2/5 |
In green, the better of the two. “n/a”: not applicable. “Not verified”: data not found in public sources, counts as 1. The evidence and source for each score are on each firm's page. Prices change often: these are as of the reading date.
For Traders: full reviewBluSky: full reviewCompare two prop firms
Frequently asked questions
Is For Traders or BluSky better?
As of November 14, 2026, For Traders leads BluSky by 0.9 point in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #24 internationally against #30. The gap comes mainly from the Visibility and Trust pillars. BluSky does better on Payouts and Trader reviews.
How much does a $100,000 account cost at For Traders and BluSky?
At list price, activation fees included: For Traders (1 step): $469; BluSky (subscription): $316. These are not the same account types: the two prices do not compare directly, and each is rated against accounts of its own type. Prices change often: check them on each firm's website before buying.
What is the maximum loss at For Traders and BluSky?
On the programme read: For Traders: 6% in total, 3% a day, trailing drawdown; BluSky: 4% in total, trailing drawdown. These rules vary with the programme chosen.
Which is more trustworthy, For Traders or BluSky?
Trust score out of 100: For Traders 77.2, BluSky 65.8. It covers regulator warnings, the company register, the identity shown, the execution partner, marketing and website security. Neither appears on the warning lists consulted. This score describes what is published at that date; it does not guarantee future payouts.
Which platforms do For Traders and BluSky offer?
According to their public pages, For Traders offers MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, cTrader and For Traders X, and BluSky Tradovate, Rithmic, Tickblaze, BlackArrow, NinjaTrader, Volumetrica (DeepCharts), Tradesea and Onyx.