Goat Funded Trader vs Funding Pips: which prop firm is better?
As of October 30, 2026, Goat Funded Trader leads Funding Pips by 4.8 points in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #43 internationally against #107. The gap comes mainly from the Payouts and Trust pillars. Funding Pips does better on Trader reviews.
2027 edition · updated October 30, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · International ranking · Ranking methodology · Prop firm directory
The criteria, side by side
| Criterion | Goat Funded Trader | Funding Pips |
|---|---|---|
| Score out of 100 | 72.3 | 67.5 |
| International rank | #43 | #107 |
| $100,000 account | $478 | $652 |
| Trust · 30 % | 3.78/5 | 2.95/5 |
| 1. Regulator warningsscale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 2. Registered company and agescale | 3/5 | 1/5 |
| 3. Identity and contactscale | 4/5 | 1/5 |
| 4. Regulated execution partnerscale | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| 5. Honest marketingscale | 1/5 | 2/5 |
| 6. Secure websitescale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)scale | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Payouts · 25 % | 4.29/5 | 2.88/5 |
| 8. Public payout proofscale | 3/5 | 1/5 |
| 9. Published processing timescale | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| 10. Payout frequency and first payoutscale | 3/5 | 1/5 |
| 11. Withdrawal terms and methodsscale | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| 12. Payout history and incidentsscale | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Trader reviews · 20 % | 2.67/5 | 4.67/5 |
| 13. Trader rating (Trustpilot and Google)scale | 1/5 | 4/5 |
| 14. Number of reviewsscale | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| 15. Suspicious review warningscale | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| 16. 12-month trendscale | n/a | n/a |
| Trading conditions · 15 % | 3.48/5 | 3.29/5 |
| 17. Rule clarityscale | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| 18. Cost of a $100,000 accountscale | 4/5 | 1/5 |
| 19. Profit target relative to maximum lossscale | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| 20. Drawdown typescale | 1/5 | 5/5 |
| 21. Rules restricting how you tradescale | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| 22. What the trader keeps: split and feesscale | 4/5 | 1/5 |
| Visibility · 10 % | 3.55/5 | 3.43/5 |
| 23. Track recordscale | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| 24. Websites linking to itscale | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| 25. Press mentions, Wikipedia pagescale | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| 26. Audiencescale | 3/5 | – |
In green, the better of the two. “n/a”: not applicable. “Not verified”: data not found in public sources, counts as 1. The evidence and source for each score are on each firm's page. Prices change often: these are as of the reading date.
Goat Funded Trader: full reviewFunding Pips: full reviewCompare two prop firms
Frequently asked questions
Is Goat Funded Trader or Funding Pips better?
As of October 30, 2026, Goat Funded Trader leads Funding Pips by 4.8 points in the 2027 prop firm ranking: #43 internationally against #107. The gap comes mainly from the Payouts and Trust pillars. Funding Pips does better on Trader reviews.
How much does a $100,000 account cost at Goat Funded Trader and Funding Pips?
At list price, activation fees included: Goat Funded Trader (2 steps): $478; Funding Pips (2 steps): $652. For this same account type, Goat Funded Trader is cheaper by $174. Prices change often: check them on each firm's website before buying.
What is the maximum loss at Goat Funded Trader and Funding Pips?
On the programme read: Goat Funded Trader: 8% in total, 3% a day; Funding Pips: 10% in total, 5% a day, static drawdown. These rules vary with the programme chosen.
Which is more trustworthy, Goat Funded Trader or Funding Pips?
Trust score out of 100: Goat Funded Trader 75.6, Funding Pips 59.0. It covers regulator warnings, the company register, the identity shown, the execution partner, marketing and website security. Neither appears on the warning lists consulted. This score describes what is published at that date; it does not guarantee future payouts.
Which platforms do Goat Funded Trader and Funding Pips offer?
According to their public pages, Goat Funded Trader offers MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader and TradeLocker, and Funding Pips MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Match-Trader. In common: MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Match-Trader.