On demand payout prop firms: the 2027 ranking
24 of the 276 prop firms in the Tradoshi 2027 ranking qualify for this page. The highest ranked are HyroTrader (77.8/100), Lucid Trading (76.9/100) and Propr (76.6/100). On demand means no fixed cycle, but not always no conditions: a profit threshold, minimum trading days or a cap per payout. The quoted sentence says what the firm announces.
Tradoshi 2027 ranking, data as of October 30, 2026. Methodology
The 24 firms, from highest to lowest ranked
| Rank | Firm | Score | What the firm says | Account type | $100K price | Max loss | Daily loss | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | HyroTrader | 77.8 | « Payouts on demand in USDT or USDC. » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Bybit, BloFin, Hyro, Tealstreet |
| #13 | Lucid Trading | 76.9 | « On Demand PayoutsONOFF » Source | One step challenge | $272 | 3% | 1.8% | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower |
| #15 | Propr | 76.6 | « On-demand, at any time, with no minimum waiting period » Source | One step challenge | $999 | 6%static | 3% | not recorded |
| #24 | Alpha Capital Group | 74.7 | « Bi-Weekly or On-Demand — this sets when you can request rewards and the base plan price. » Source | Instant funding | $457 | 5% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, DXtrade, TradeLocker |
| #28 | MasterFunders | 74.4 | « After entering the MasterTrader phase, eligible traders may request performance-based compensation beginning 72 hours after qualification, then on demand. » Source | Two phase challenge | $549 | 10%static | 5% | Match-Trader |
| #35 | Carrot Funding | 73.3 | « Payouts are on demand, any time once eligible. » Source | Two phase challenge | $309 | 6%static | 3% | not recorded |
| #36 | BEM Funding | 73.1 | « The Program offers Reward on Demand, allowing Users to request rewards at any time, provided all eligibility criteria are met. » Source | One step challenge | $520 | 6%trailing | 3% | DXtrade, cTrader, MetaTrader 5 |
| #38 | SFX Funded | 72.9 | « Rewards cycleOn demandMax daily loss2%Max loss5%Consistency rule15% » Source | Instant funding | $599 | 5% | 2% | Match-Trader, Platform 5 |
| #56 | Blue Guardian | 71.4 | « Payout Frequency: Instant Payout (On-demand) » Source | Instant funding | $623 | 6%trailing | 3% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker |
| #70 | Blueberry Funded | 70.4 | « 14 Days (7 Day & On Demand Available) » Source | One step challenge | $835 | 12% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| #105 | Elites Funding | 67.7 | « Payouts on Demand · Anytime, Any Day » Source | Two phase challenge | $499 | 10%static | 5% | TradeLocker |
| #111 | Breakout | 67.3 | « Payouts are on-demand, 24/7, including weekends. » Source | One step challenge | $800 | 6%static | 3% | Breakout terminal, DXtrade |
| #116 | Lark Funding | 67.0 | « First PayoutOn DemandSubsequent PayoutsMonthly » Source | Instant funding | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded |
| #124 | Sway Funded | 66.5 | « Profit Target ReductionInstant AccountRewards on Demand » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | 10% | not recorded | not recorded |
| #140 | Funded Trader Markets | 65.8 | « Cycle de PaiementOn-demand » Source | One step challenge | $622 | 6% | 4% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| #141 | FunderBlu | 65.6 | « Bi-weekly rewards are available on evaluation accounts, but you can enable On-demand rewards with an add-on. » Source | One step challenge | $500 | 9% | 3% | TradingView |
| #158 | Next Level Funded | 64.7 | « Reward cycleOn-Demand » Source | Instant funding | $194 | 4% | 3% | Platform 5, DashTrade, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| #194 | Investabl | 62.0 | « Payouts are on demand and paid on-chain in USD, once you meet the payout requirements and finish a one-time KYC check. » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | MetaTrader 5, Investabl platform |
| #197 | The Prop Trade | 61.5 | « For Instant Funding accounts, rewards can be requested on demand as soon as you meet the payout eligibility criteria. » Source | Instant funding | not recorded | 6% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradeLocker |
| #207 | Propanium | 60.4 | « 24H payouts on demand » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | cTrader |
| #209 | fundedhive | 60.3 | « PayFromProfits 1 STEP Challenge With Instant On Demand Daily Payouts Under 60 Seconds 24/7 » Source | One step challenge | $1,248 | 10%static | 5% | cTrader |
| #222 | Finotive FundingRegulator warning: see its review | 59.4 | « 1st Payout on demand,then every 7 Days » Source | One step challenge | $650 | 7.5%static | not recorded | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #236 | Evercrest Funding | 57.6 | « Reward ⓘ On-Demand » Source | Instant funding | $750 | 6% | 3% | MetaTrader 5 |
| #265 | Crypto Street | 51.3 | « PayoutsOn-demand » Source | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded |
Price of a $100,000 account, activation fee included, with no promo code, for each firm's rated programme. This page contains no affiliate links.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best on demand payout prop firm?
In the Tradoshi 2027 ranking it is HyroTrader, #8 of 276 with 77.8/100, on public criteria covering trust, payouts, reviews, conditions and visibility. The right choice also depends on the price and the loss rules.
How many firms are on this page?
24 of the 276 in the 2027 ranking, as of October 30, 2026. Only a quote recorded on the firm's website brings it in: a missing firm may still offer it.
Which one is the cheapest?
Like for like, for a $100,000 account with no promo code: instant funding: Next Level Funded ($194); one step challenge: Lucid Trading ($272); two phase challenge: Carrot Funding ($309).
Compare another way
Daily payoutWeekly payoutCrypto payoutBi-weekly payout
Instant fundingCheapest100% profit splitNo daily drawdownTradeLockerUSA
Futures prop firm rankingForex and CFDs prop firm rankingCrypto prop firm rankingStocks prop firm ranking
Prop firm directoryInternational rankingCompare two prop firmsHyroTrader alternatives