Comparison · Trading schools

NISM, National Institute of Securities Markets vs PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo: which trading school is better?

As of November 5, 2026, NISM, National Institute of Securities Markets leads PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo by 4.4 points in the 2027 trading and investing school ranking: #134 internationally against #240. The gap comes mainly from the Recognition and employability and Teaching pillars. PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo does better on Student reviews. On Trust and Visibility, they are level.

2027 edition · updated November 5, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · Ranking methodology

All 25 criteria, side by side

CriterionNISM, National Institute of Securities MarketsPUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo
Score out of 10078.474.0
International rank#134#240
Rank among specialist schools#1 of 668#3 of 668
Trust · 10 %4.23/54.42/5
1. Regulator warningsscale5/55/5
2. Registered company and agescalen/a–
3. Transparency: price, refunds, legal notice, contactscale4/55/5
4. Named, verifiable instructorsscale1/54/5
5. Honest marketing, no promise of profitscale4/54/5
6. Secure websitescale5/55/5
7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)scale5/52/5
Teaching · 20 %3.40/53.10/5
8. Curriculum qualityscale5/53/5
9. Real practicescale3/52/5
10. Mentoring and supportscale1/51/5
11. Cost per training hourscalen/a5/5
Student reviews · 20 %4.50/55.00/5
13. Reviewsscale4/55/5
14. Number of reviewsscale5/55/5
15. Suspicious review warningscalen/an/a
16. 12-month trendscalen/an/a
Recognition and employability · 30 %3.51/52.57/5
12. Degree-granting programscale4/54/5
18. Degree recognized by a state or the professionscale4/54/5
25. Employability and career outcomesscale3/52/5
17. Institutional accreditationscalen/a1/5
19. Labels and awardsscale1/53/5
20. Official partnersscale5/51/5
Visibility · 20 %4.33/54.33/5
21. Domain agescale5/55/5
22. Websites linking to itscale4/54/5
23. Press mentions, Wikipedia pagescale–n/a
24. Audience: social media and newsletterscale4/54/5

In green, the better of the two scores. “n/a”: not applicable, the criterion is left out of its pillar. “–”: criterion not yet assessed. The evidence and source for each score are on each school's listing.

NISM, National Institute of Securities Markets: full listingPUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo: full listing