Comparison · Trading schools

PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo vs Samuel & Co Trading: which trading school is better?

As of November 5, 2026, PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo leads Samuel & Co Trading by 0.5 point in the 2027 trading and investing school ranking: #240 internationally against #255. The gap comes mainly from the Visibility and Student reviews pillars. Samuel & Co Trading does better on Teaching. On Trust and Recognition and employability, they are level.

2027 edition · updated November 5, 2026 · next updates planned for December 2026 and January 2027 · Ranking methodology

All 25 criteria, side by side

CriterionPUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazoSamuel & Co Trading
Score out of 10074.073.5
International rank#240#255
Rank among specialist schools#3 of 668#4 of 668
Trust · 10 %4.42/54.55/5
1. Regulator warningsscale5/55/5
2. Registered company and agescale–5/5
3. Transparency: price, refunds, legal notice, contactscale5/54/5
4. Named, verifiable instructorsscale4/54/5
5. Honest marketing, no promise of profitscale4/54/5
6. Secure websitescale5/55/5
7. Protected domain (SPF, DMARC, headers)scale2/53/5
Teaching · 20 %3.10/55.00/5
8. Curriculum qualityscale3/54/5
9. Real practicescale2/54/5
10. Mentoring and supportscale1/55/5
11. Cost per training hourscale5/5n/a
Student reviews · 20 %5.00/54.67/5
13. Reviewsscale5/54/5
14. Number of reviewsscale5/55/5
15. Suspicious review warningscalen/a5/5
16. 12-month trendscalen/an/a
Recognition and employability · 30 %2.57/52.74/5
12. Degree-granting programscale4/54/5
18. Degree recognized by a state or the professionscale4/54/5
25. Employability and career outcomesscale2/52/5
17. Institutional accreditationscale1/52/5
19. Labels and awardsscale3/51/5
20. Official partnersscale1/53/5
Visibility · 20 %4.33/52.33/5
21. Domain agescale5/54/5
22. Websites linking to itscale4/52/5
23. Press mentions, Wikipedia pagescalen/an/a
24. Audience: social media and newsletterscale4/51/5

In green, the better of the two scores. “n/a”: not applicable, the criterion is left out of its pillar. “–”: criterion not yet assessed. The evidence and source for each score are on each school's listing.

PUCRS Online, Investimentos e trading: análise e ativos de curto prazo: full listingSamuel & Co Trading: full listing