Prop firms · By loss rule
No consistency rule prop firms: the 2027 ranking
112 of the 276 prop firms in the Tradoshi 2027 ranking qualify for this page. The highest ranked are FTMO (84.5/100), The5ers (80.6/100) and FundedNext (80.5/100). A consistency rule caps how much of your profit can come from a single day. Many firms only drop it on some accounts, or once you are funded: the quoted sentence says which.
Tradoshi 2027 ranking, data as of October 30, 2026. Methodology
The 112 firms, from highest to lowest ranked
| Rank | Firm | Score | What the firm says | Account type | $100K price | Max loss | Daily loss | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | FTMO | 84.5 | « No Consistency Rule in Sim-Funded » Source | Two phase challenge | $601 | 10%static | 5% | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, cTrader |
| #3 | The5ers | 80.6 | « Note: There is no consistency rule during the evaluation phases for the 2-Step plan » Source | One step challenge | $249 | 6% | 3% | MetaTrader, BlackArrow |
| #4 | FundedNext | 80.5 | « No Daily Loss Limit | No Consistency Rule » Source | Two phase challenge | $550 | 10%static | 5% | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| #5 | Tradeify | 80.5 | « No consistency once funded » Source | One step challenge | $265 | 3%trailing | none | Tradovate, WealthCharts, Rithmic, Tradesea |
| #6 | City Traders Imperium | 80.4 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | One step challenge | $449 | 5%trailing | none | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #11 | FundYourFX | 77.6 | « No Consistency Rule » Source | Instant funding | $1,599 | 6%static | 4% | Match-Trader, Platform 5 |
| #12 | Traders Launch | 77.3 | « No consistency rule once you are funded » Source | One step challenge | $159 | 1%trailing | not recorded | TradingView, Volumetrica (DeepCharts), Quantower, Hyperprop |
| #15 | Propr | 76.6 | « No time limits, no consistency rules, no minimum trading days » Source | One step challenge | $999 | 6%static | 3% | not recorded |
| #16 | Top One Futures | 76.3 | « Get Daily Payouts with No Consistency, Ever » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $398 /month | 3%trailing | 1.25% | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, BlackArrow, WealthCharts |
| #18 | For Traders | 76.2 | « No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $469 | 6%trailing | 3% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, cTrader, For Traders X |
| #21 | Phoenix Trader Funding | 75.5 | « There is no consistency rule on the funded account » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $269 /month | 3% | none | Odin, Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader |
| #26 | MyFundedFutures | 74.5 | « you in control: payouts anytime, a static Max Loss Limit (drawdown) that never moves, and no consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Tradovate, Quantower, TradingView, Volumetrica (DeepCharts) |
| #27 | Phidias Prop Firm | 74.4 | « No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $900 | 0.8%static | none | Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Volumetrica (DeepCharts) |
| #28 | MasterFunders | 74.4 | « No Consistency, Minimum Trading Days or any other Hidden Rules » Source | Two phase challenge | $549 | 10%static | 5% | Match-Trader |
| #33 | Elite Trader Funding | 73.7 | « No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $504 /month | 3%trailing | none | Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView |
| #34 | Vanquish Trader | 73.4 | « No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $500 /month | 5%trailing | not recorded | DXtrade |
| #35 | Carrot Funding | 73.3 | « No Consistency Score and no Best Day Rule on any challenge » Source | Two phase challenge | $309 | 6%static | 3% | not recorded |
| #36 | BEM Funding | 73.1 | « with no consistency rule on eval and no minimum days » Source | One step challenge | $520 | 6%trailing | 3% | DXtrade, cTrader, MetaTrader 5 |
| #37 | MILTRADERS | 73.0 | « Zero: no consistency rule once funded » Source | One step challenge | $378 | 3%trailing | none | Volumetrica (DeepCharts), DeepMap, ATAS, Quantower |
| #38 | SFX Funded | 72.9 | « No consistency rule » Source | Instant funding | $599 | 5% | 2% | Match-Trader, Platform 5 |
| #39 | AlpineFunded | 72.8 | « Two targets, two loss limits, no time limit, no consistency rule » Source | Instant funding | $667 | 5%trailing | 3% | cTrader, MetaTrader 5 |
| #42 | Dolvero | 72.6 | « There is no deadline, no minimum number of trading days and no consistency check, so a single good day can finish the evaluation » Source | Two phase challenge | $549 | 10%static | 5% | MetaTrader 5, DolveroTrader web terminal, Bybit |
| #47 | BluSky | 71.8 | « No consistency in the eval » Source | Two phase challenge, subscription | $316 /month | 4%trailing | none | Tradovate, Rithmic, Tickblaze, BlackArrow |
| #49 | iFunds.io | 71.7 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | Instant funding | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | MetaTrader 5 |
| #50 | Maven Trading | 71.6 | « There is no Consistency Score requirement for the Standard 1 Step Challenge or Simulated Fund » Source | One step challenge | $380 | 5% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #52 | getleveragedRegulator warning: see its review | 71.6 | « Static drawdown, no consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $188 | 6% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| #53 | AIFO | 71.5 | « No consistency rule applies on this account » Source | Two phase challenge | $449 | 10%static | 5% | MetaTrader 5 |
| #55 | PineX Capital | 71.4 | « No consistency rule » Source | Two phase challenge | not recorded | 10%static | 4% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| #56 | Blue Guardian | 71.4 | « Funded accounts carry no consistency rule » Source | Instant funding | $623 | 6%trailing | 3% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker |
| #59 | Rev One Trading | 71.3 | « No buffer zone, no profit goals, no consistency rule, no daily loss limit » Source | One step challenge | $205 | 4%trailing | none | BlackArrow |
| #60 | Axis Funded | 71.2 | « PRIME: No daily profit cap and no consistency rule applies » Source | Instant funding | $10,000 | 10%static | none | Match-Trader |
| #61 | FX2 Funding | 71.1 | « No consistency rules, competitive pricing, and real exchange access — all backed by the FX » Source | Two phase challenge | $930 | 10%static | 4% | DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader |
| #67 | Aqua Funded | 70.5 | « No consistency on funded » Source | Instant funding | $560 | 6% | 3% | Match-Trader, TradeLocker, MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| #68 | Velotrade | 70.5 | « SPY and QQQ with news trading allowed and no consistency rule » Source | Two phase challenge | $769 | 10%static | 5% | DXtrade |
| #69 | FundingRock | 70.5 | « There's no Consistency Rule during the Evaluation » Source | Two phase challenge | $350 | 6%static | 3% | TradeLocker, cTrader |
| #70 | Blueberry Funded | 70.4 | « 2-Step accounts have no consistency rules, in either phase or on the Funded Account » Source | One step challenge | $835 | 12% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| #76 | Atlas Funded | 70.0 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | One step challenge | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | TradeLocker, MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #78 | Sure Leverage Funding | 69.8 | « No Consistency RuleInstant ZeroInstant Funding Zero » Source | Instant funding | $1,448 | 4% | 2% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| #79 | Alpha Futures | 69.6 | « No Consistency RuleOn your Qualified account » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $279 /month | 3%trailing | 2% | AlphaTrader, TradingView, WealthCharts, Volumetrica (DeepCharts) |
| #83 | SiegPath | 69.4 | « No Consistency Rule » Source | One step challenge | $585 | 6% | 3% | Sieg Terminal |
| #84 | FTUK | 69.4 | « You can pass in as little as one profitable trading day, and there is no consistency rule during the Evaluation » Source | One step challenge | $681 | 6% | 5% | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader, WealthCharts |
| #85 | Atmos Funded | 69.3 | « One phase, no minimum trading days and no consistency rule » Source | Two phase challenge | $549 | 10%static | 5% | MetaTrader 5 |
| #86 | FundedElite | 69.3 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | One step challenge | $504 | 6%static | 3% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #87 | SizeProp | 69.2 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | One step challenge | $777 | 3.5%static | 2% | not recorded |
| #88 | Funded Daily | 69.1 | « There is no consistency rule during the evaluation » Source | Instant funding | $845 | 8%static | 4% | TradeLocker, Platform 5 |
| #89 | BrightFunded | 69.0 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | Two phase challenge | $531 | 8%static | 4% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, DXtrade |
| #90 | dominionfunding | 69.0 | « Feature 03 No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $549 | 10%static | 4% | MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| #92 | Fondeo | 68.9 | « No consistency rule — the 40% profit distribution rule does not apply to funded accounts » Source | One step challenge, subscription | $300 /month | 5%static | 4% | Bybit, Fondeo Terminal |
| #94 | Top One Trader | 68.9 | « 2 Step Plus No Consistency Rule » Source | One step challenge | $575 | 7% | 4% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| #95 | 100X Club | 68.8 | « No consistency rule applies during the evaluation » Source | Instant funding | $839 | 8%static | 4% | cTrader |
| #96 | Pipstone Capital | 68.7 | « No Consistency Rules » Source | Instant funding | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| #97 | IQ Capital | 68.7 | « No consistency rule during the Challenge » Source | One step challenge | $475 | 3% | 1.5% | Quantower, ATAS, Volumetrica (DeepCharts) |
| #98 | FLI Capital | 68.7 | « No Consistency Rule » Source | One step challenge | $188 | 3%trailing | none | Tickblaze, Volumetrica (DeepCharts) |
| #99 | DayTraders | 68.6 | « No consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $220 | 4%trailing | 2.5% | ArcTrader, Rithmic, TradingView |
| #102 | Vanta Trading | 68.1 | « A 5% loss limit, no time limit, no consistency rule » Source | One step challenge | $1,099 | 5%static | not recorded | Vanta Trading Desk |
| #104 | Traderscale | 67.8 | « No Consistency Rule » Source | Instant funding | $779 | 6% | 3% | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| #105 | Elites Funding | 67.7 | « No consistency rule during the evaluation phase » Source | Two phase challenge | $499 | 10%static | 5% | TradeLocker |
| #108 | Funded Futures Family | 67.4 | « No consistency rule on Premier+ and Prime plan for evaluation phase » Source | Evaluation, no subscription | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, WealthCharts |
| #109 | Pipster | 67.4 | « art a challenge with a 6% profit target, 6% static maximum drawdown, no daily loss limit, no consistency rule, and no time limit » Source | One step challenge | $479 | 8%static | 4% | Match-Trader |
| #111 | Breakout | 67.3 | « No consistency rules, minimum trading days, or time limits » Source | One step challenge | $800 | 6%static | 3% | Breakout terminal, DXtrade |
The 60 highest ranked of 112. The full list is in the directory.
Price of a $100,000 account, activation fee included, with no promo code, for each firm's rated programme. This page contains no affiliate links.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best no consistency rule prop firm?
In the Tradoshi 2027 ranking it is FTMO, #1 of 276 with 84.5/100, on public criteria covering trust, payouts, reviews, conditions and visibility. The right choice also depends on the price and the loss rules.
How many firms are on this page?
112 of the 276 in the 2027 ranking, as of October 30, 2026. Only a quote recorded on the firm's website brings it in: a missing firm may still offer it.
Which one is the cheapest?
Like for like, for a $100,000 account with no promo code: instant funding: Next Level Funded ($194); one step challenge: Traders Launch ($159); two phase challenge: Carrot Funding ($309); monthly subscription: Legends Trading ($236 a month).
Compare another way
No daily drawdownStatic drawdown
Instant fundingCheapest$100K accountsRise payoutPay by cardcTrader and copy trading100% profit splitTradeLockerUSA
Futures prop firm rankingForex and CFDs prop firm rankingCrypto prop firm rankingStocks prop firm ranking
Prop firm directoryInternational rankingCompare two prop firmsFTMO alternatives